General Chatter

...now browsing by category

 

A picture is worth a thousand words… or at least a poem’s worth

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012

Over on Google+ there’s a photo project going on called GOOGLE + :: Project 52 :: 2012 wherein photographers (amateur or professional) submit a photo every week according to a provided theme. I’m not much of a photographer, but I thought it would be nice to have something similar for writing so my mother and I decided to join forces: she’d take the photos and I would write something to go with them. I’m sure most of the accompaniment will end up being poetry but then again, maybe not. It should be fun.

The entries are due on Google+ each week by 20:00 PST so I’ll try to have our entries posted here by the following Tuesday (and the first one was due yesterday so I plan to have it up later tonight). I highly recommend following the contest if you’re interested in photography the first round of submissions is impressive. Also, the contest name is a bit of a mouthful and more than I care to type, so I’m going to shorten it to “GP52″ going forward.

Shopping for a Star Trek novel

Saturday, March 12th, 2011

I’ve been watching a lot of Star Trek lately – in fact The Tholian Web episode of The Original Series is playing in the top right hand corner of my screen as I write this. It’s made me itchy to find some good TOS books for my Kindle; I go through them so quickly that it’s simply more fiscally prudent to borrow them from the library or buy them in digital format. I have a handful of physical copies of books I really enjoyed like First Frontier (how can you not love a book that basically mashes TOS and Jurassic Park?), Sarek, Kahless, Planet X (an X-Men/TNG crossover), A Burning House, The Devil’s Heart, and one absolutely horrific book that I bought strictly for the title (Spock Must Die!) at a second hand bookstore for around a buck fifty… I’ve considered getting rid of it but I start laughing every time I look at it so it always ends up back on my shelf.

What struck me was that while I was paging through the search results on Amazon, I kept scanning past anything set in The Next Generation or Deep Space Nine environments without even considering it. I like TNG and DS9, in fact they are my favorites in the Star Trek universe, but I have read, comparatively speaking, almost none of the books. That’s not to say I’ve never read a TNG or DS9 book – I have, and as mentioned above, a few have even earned a space on my bookshelf – but for the most part I have very distinct tastes when it comes to watching Star Trek versus reading Star Trek. When I’m watching Star Trek, I look primarily for TNG or DS9 (though I’ll happily watch anything except Voyager), but when I’m reading Star Trek I just don’t seem to give anything other than TOS serious consideration.

It seems to me that the primary difference between TOS and TNG/DS9 is that the later shows are built around a true ensemble cast while TOS was not. That’s not to say there aren’t a slew of interesting characters in TOS, but the plots of the shows were centered, rather blatantly, around one character (three if you’re being generous). I enjoy watching TNG and DS9 because an ensemble cast works beautifully on a television show; you can tell different stories by focusing on just one of the characters at a time or tell more “epic” stories that include everybody. But what makes those “epic” storylines work is the fact that you can show the action instead of telling it, which allows more characters to participate in the action without slowing the story down. Think about watching a movie (or reading a comic book) with an epic fight scene where there are ten or more participants actively fighting plus some spectators or support characters (sidekicks, injured comrades, etc.) and then try to imagine how that would translate to a book. The scene in the movie/comic would likely be very energizing while the scene in the book would likely be, at best, a little slow and boring, or, at worse, long, hard to follow, and confusing.

When it comes to a book, it helps to have a single protagonist to drive the story forward and keep the plot moving; basically, the same thing that limited the story-telling capabilities of TOS as a television show actually helps to tell a more focused story in a book. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying you can’t tell a good story with an ensemble cast in a book or that I don’t like complex plots, I’m just saying that telling a good story is easier with a single protagonist and, in all honesty, when I pick up a Star Trek book I’m looking for an exciting science fiction adventure that’s interesting and maybe a little cerebral, but not overly complex or thought provoking. When I reach for a Star Trek novel it’s because I just want to read something fun.

I guess I’m kind of simple that way. A little introspection or social commentary is fine, but when I’m in the mood for a frivolous science fiction adventure I really just want the bad-guys to get what’s coming to them, the heroes to save the day… and maybe for a few things to blow up.

Tabletop Writing

Saturday, February 26th, 2011

I love writing, but somewhere along the way I wandered onto the path of Computer Science and that’s where I’ve been for the last 17 years. I still wrote occasionally at first, but the hours associated with technical jobs are frequently chaotic, unpredictable, and long. Eventually, taking the time to sit down and write for myself gave way to a long list of must-do, should-do, and general distraction until I basically stopped writing anything at all except application and database code.

Then in 2009 I had a realization – or maybe I just re-learned a fundamental, personal truth: writing makes me happy and if I don’t make time for it, then what’s the point? I decided that even if it’s only for 30 minutes at a time I was going to write something every day.

Of course, saying you’re going to write every day is one thing. Doing it is another.

In an effort to give me some focus and help me flex my creative writing muscles, I came up with something I call Tabletop Writing (or Stop Being Lame and Just Write Already). The rules of the game are simple:

  1. Generate a collection of writing prompts/exercises/topics and number them sequentially – the more you have, and the more varied the collection (fiction, non-fiction, poetry, etc.) the better. Let the total number of exercises be N.
  2. Take as many 10-sided die as there are digits in max(N).
  3. Roll your dice.
  4. Reading them left-to-right, take the value of the first die modulo X, where X is the largest possible value of the digit in the most significant place of max(N).
  5. Take the value of the subsequent dice – in order – for the remaining digits.
  6. If the selected exercise doesn’t exist (for example, N=115 and you’ve rolled 124) you may either re-roll the invalid digit or use the roll modulo Y where Y is the largest possible value for the problem place.
  7. If the exercise has already been competed, roll to choose direction (even=up, odd=down) and take the next sequentially available exercise.
  8. Using the selected exercise, write for at least 30 minutes – no skipping/cheating just because you happen to get a “hard” one!
  9. The same prompt may be used for up to one week, but the current exercise must be marked “complete” and a new prompt selected after seven days.
  10. For any prompt that ends in a finished product (i.e., a completed poem, essay, or short story), “publish” the result by emailing it to a friend or family member, posting it to a blog or forum (even if it’s just your Facebook profile!), or reading it to someone so you can get feedback.

Yes. I know. I am a nerd. It’s congenital.

Truth be told, I just wanted an excuse to use my dice (I don’t get many opportunities), but it makes picking a writing exercise fun and gives me something to look forward to so, in the end, I suppose the “why” of it doesn’t really matter. My goal is to have something worth posting every week beginning today. Some things will (undoubtedly) be more polished than others, but that’s not what matters. Right now, what matters, is making the time for what I love.

Wish me luck!

There is no recipe!

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

This page contains “recipes” for cooking The Meat featured at the Stars without LIMS and A Job, A Place, A Puppy parties thrown by Ann Rea. As the post title suggests, there really isn’t a recipe per se; the process for cooking the tenderloin is very straightforward and there’s nothing so tricky going on that a little practice can’t fix it. The most important thing, whether your using variant #1 or variant #2, is to be mindful of your heat.

Feel free to use the Contact page if you have any questions :)

Now, without further ado, I give you:

 

The Meat

 
 
Ingredients


  1. 1 Costco brand rate CHOICE beef tenderloin (7-9 lbs)
  2. McCormick Grill Mates Montreal Steak Rub
  3. Enough olive oil to coat the ternderloin evenly

 
 
Preparation


01] Wash and dry the tenderloin.

02] Trim off all of the fat and pull off the silver skin (the film of sinew covering the tenderloin) with your fingers. Working at the small end of the tenderloin, slide a knife under the silver skin, lift and grab the silver skin and pull it off in strips. For a better grip use a paper towel to grasp the silver skin. As you slide the knife under, pull the silver skin toward the large end of tenderloin (the head). Removing the silver skin will prevent the tenderloin from curling and will eliminate a portion of meat that will be a bit tough.

03] Cover the meat with the rub. Don’t be dainty about it: use your hands and be generous; it’s called a “rub” for a reason.

04] Place in the refrigerator and let the meat sit with the rub for a minimum of 2 hours and up to 5 hours.

05] Remove the meat from the refrigerator one hour before you are ready to cook it and let it come to room temperature.

 
 
Cooking The Meat Variant 1 – On the Stove


The steps below were used to cook The Meat for the “Stars without LIMS” party.

06] Meat is best cooked on a grill or in cast iron, so the closest indoor equivalent you have should be used: a cast iron stove-top griddle or cast iron skillet are best, but any large, heavy-bottomed skillet or saute pan will work.

07] Cut the tenderloin so that you are working with pieces of meat that are vaguely rectangular; if you look at the piece, it should be roughly the same thickness from one end to the other. It’s okay if you end up with many pieces; it’s more important that each piece be roughly the same thickness so it will cook evenly than having a specific number of pieces. For example: image
Notice that while the various pieces are not the same thickness relative to each other, individually, each piece is roughly the same thickness when viewed left-to-right and top-to-bottom.

08] Separate the cut pieces into batches that are appropriate for the griddle/skillet/pan you are using. A single batch should be small enough to fit in the pan with 1-2 inches of free space around each piece of meat.

09] If your stove has a fan/vent-hood, turn it on; if it doesn’t, open a few windows as close to the kitchen as you can manage.

10] Place your griddle/skillet/pan on the stove over high heat and let the pan heat until you can flick some water on the cooking surface with your fingers and the water sizzles and dances slightly. If the water just sits there, the pan isn’t ready yet. If the water skitters and rolls around like beads, your pan is too hot. Once the pan is heated through, reduce the heat to maintain the temperature: if you are working with a cast iron cooking surface turn the heat down to medium and for stainless steel pans, turn it to medium high. Everything from the size of your stove, the material of your pan, and whether your stove is gas or electric will affect how quickly the pan heats up, how well it retains its heat, and how quickly it recovers its heat while it’s in use so you may need to adjust the heat (either up or down) as you go. It will take a little practice to find the right combination of temperature and pan that is specific to your stove, but generally speaking, you should never need to turn the heat any lower than medium or any higher than medium high once you begin cooking. This is why cast iron is the first choice for cooking The Meat; it retains and radiates heat the most evenly, which means less fiddling with the temperature on the stove.

11] Working in batches, coat the meat with olive oil and place it on the cooking surface; again, don’t be dainty, use your hands – they’re the best kitchen tool you’ve got. The meat should sizzle when you place it in the pan; if it doesn’t, your pan is too cold and you will need to turn up the heat to bring the pan to temperature.

12] Turn the meat every 5 minutes. A little smoke is expected, but if the pan begins to smoke significantly, your heat is probably too high and you should turn it down. You want to hear a moderate sizzle while the meat is cooking, not an aggressive hissing.

13] Depending on the size of your pieces and the heating power of your stove, the meat will be done in 15 to 30 minutes. The best way to know if it is done is to use a meat thermometer. The meat is medium rare when the internal temperature reads around 145 degrees and medium at around 160. Remember that meat will continue to cook for a bit after you pull it from the heat, so remove the meat from the pan approximately 5 degrees *before* it reaches the final temperature you’re looking for.

14] Place the meat on a cutting board and allow it to rest at least 10 minutes before slicing.

Note #1
The most important thing you can do while you’re cooking the meat is keep an eye on your heat: if the cooking surface is too cold, the meat won’t develop a nice crust, and if it’s too hot the outside will burn (especially the spices in the rub) long before the inside is cooked properly. With each batch, the temperature of the cooking surface will dip when you first add the meat. If you suspect your pan is too cold, turn the heat up and wait between batches for the pan to come up to temperature then turn the heat down slightly when you add the next batch. If you suspect your pan is too hot (or you’re seeing a lot of smoke), turn the heat down to medium and let the meat cook for 8 to 10 minutes per side before turning instead of turning it every 5 minutes.

Note #2
If you are working with many small batches, the olive oil and rub from the meat can collect on the pan and burn. Every 2-3 batches, scrape up any loose debris in the pan and either scoop it out with a spoon or, if it’s a small pan, scrape it out into the sink. Excess rub/oil in the pan will burn and smoke and make it seem like your pan is too hot when, really, it’s the gunk in the pan that’s smoldering, not the meat.

 
 
Cooking The Meat Varient 2 – On the Grill


The steps below were used to cook The Meat for the “A Job, A Place, A Puppy” party and come courtesy of Bobby Chavis.

06] I used a Charbroil Bar-B-Cue Grill which is large enough to accommodate both tenderloins. A Weber grill will work just fine for single tenderloin. Light enough charcoal to cover the bottom of the grill in a single layer if using a Weber grill (22 inch diameter). If using a larger grill such as the Charbroil Bar-B-cue light 100 briquettes and spread over the bottom of the grill (if you light enough charcoal to cover the bottom there will be too much heat and it will require constant turning of the meat to avoid overcooking).

07] Coat the meat with olive oil.

08] Remove the tapered ends so that the tenderloin is a uniform size.

09] Place the tenderloin on the grill. Turn the tenderloin every 5 minutes so that all four sides are exposed to the heat evenly.

10] Using a probe thermometer check the temperature of the large end of the taper section of meat. Remove the meat when the internal temperature reached 143 degrees (medium rare). The small tapered piece will be cooked in about 30 minutes. The larger pieces will take a longer to cook (25 to 30 minutes). Don’t guess; use a probe thermometer to insure that the meat is cooked to your desired tastes. You may have to add a few charcoal briquettes to maintain the heat.

11] Remove the meat from the grill and allow it to rest for 10 minutes minimum before carving.

Home-made Tomato Sauce

Monday, September 6th, 2010

image

I made home-made tomato sauce this evening for dinner. That’s not exactly news, I’ve made pasta sauces before, but this is the first time I did it without a recipe and the results exceeded my expectations.

I started by quartering about 1 pound of Crimini mushrooms that didn’t make it into dinner last week.

They got tossed into a rocket hot pan with some olive oil and sauteed over medium heat (I turned the heat down once the oil went it) until they just turned golden brown.

A onion (roughly chopped) went in next along with a little salt. That was sauteed for 5 to 10 minutes before I added a fist full of chopped sage (from the garden) and some garlic to the party.

I continued to brown everything over medium heat until the sage and garlic were fragrant and everything else was nice and toasty. The meat went in at that point – beef (1/2 lb), pork (1/4 lb), and lamb (1/4 lb) that had been mixed with 3 or 4 healthy flatware teaspoons of yogurt; I didn’t have any bread for a panade and hoped it would work as a substitution.

Once the meat had mostly browned but was still pink in some spots I added a healthy amount – 2 or 3 turns around the pan – of white wine (Bent Creek Chardonnay).

I left that to simmer over medium heat for 10 minutes or to let the wine reduce and turn my attention to a 28 ounce can of organic whole tomatoes. I drained the tomatoes, reserving the juice, so I could crush them with my hands and added them to the pan with a few bay leaves once the wine had reduced by 1/4 to 1/2.

The sauce simmered, covered, over low heat for an hour while I escaped the heat of the kitchen and read in the hammock :)

After an hour, I added a slurry of cold milk (about 1 cup) and cornstarch (2 flatware teaspoons) and a fistful of fresh basil (also from the garden). Everything was stirred about until the color was uniform, then I covered the pan again and left it to simmer for another 30 minutes.

Aside from looking pretty with it’s patchwork of green, pink, white and brown, it smells great and tastes even better. The sauce is floral, sweet, earthy, and surprisingly creamy for how little dairy was used.

I’m serving it over some frozen mushroom ravioli (also left over from last week) with some homemade sangria and I have a feeling I will be be hard-pressed to avoid seconds!

The Future of Comics? Man, I Hope So!

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

I found an interesting blog post by Erik Larsen about the future of comics at Comic Book Resources via @bclevinger on Twitter:

http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=24545

It’s a little long, but I highly recommend reading it.

The long and the short of it is that Larsen advocates moving to a model more in line with the one used in Japan, but with a franchise or character focus. I have to say, I dig his idea. I’m one of those that only buys trades. It just isn’t monetarily prudent (in any economy) to shell out between $2 and $5 for something I can consume in 10 minutes or less and often with no significant plot development – or just enough to be really, REALLY frustrating! Even worse is the fact that fully half of a comic’s content these days is devoted to advertising so you’re not even getting full value for your money… okay, it’s probably not “half”, but it sure feels that way!

So other than the fact that I’m both a comics fan and a miser, why do I think it’s a good idea?

I’m a total Batman fangirl. Ask anyone who knows me. If there was a weekly digest of Batman comics with a lead story about the Knight-of-my-Heart, and supplemental stories that focused on – or fleshed out – the other (not Robin!) characters in the Batman universe, I would go for it.

No.

That’s a lie.

I would eat that shit up.

With a spoon and sprinkles.

And if it was available in digital format, say on a Kindle? I would be in hog heaven – mostly because the bibliophile in me wouldn’t really consider the digests “collectible”. I certainly wouldn’t oust my hardback copy of Hush, my library edition Hellboy collections, or my Penny Arcade collections to make room for a relatively low-quality comic digest; especially if it were published with the frequency Larsen advocates.

What I would do, is buy them, read them, recycle them, then anxiously wait for the inevitable trade to come out so I can have the whole story in one cleanly bound presentation that I can read over and over again. Considering this potential life cycle, having the digest in digital form makes a lot of sense (for me): I can keep it around for as long as I want without devoting space on my already crammed bookshelf and, long-term, I’d expect to replace it with a trade anyway, so it’s no-big if I accidentally delete the file, it gets corrupted, or somehow or another I manage to screw my ability to read the digital file.

The greatest advantage, as Larsen points out, is that I’d be able to try something new – either a new title or a new character – and get my feet wet with no extra effort or monetary investment. Not only would comic companies get my money for the digest, if I liked a new character well enough, they’d get my $20-$40 when I finally decide it’s worth to make some room on the shelf for that new trade.

The bottom line is that the digest-style paradigm Larsen proposes focuses on quality, well-known content bolstered by lesser known franchises, minor characters who get a chance to shine, and independent properties. It gives people what they already know they want, but it also lets them try something new in a way that is very low-risk for both the consumer and the publisher, which (potentially) gives quality, independent work that otherwise would have been rejected as “too risky” for publication a chance to be seen, which gives me more – and better – comics to read.

Even my miserly ways wouldn’t be able to stand up to such obvious high-value return on a relatively modest financial investment.

Emma Dickerson and Her Puzzles

Sunday, May 2nd, 2010

This was created as a final project in my Modern Poetry class. It’s a little rough around the edges, goes too quickly in a few spots, and there’s a glaring spelling error that was corrected and then sneaked its way back in, but as a first attempt at creating a QuickTime movie, I think I did alright :)

A Discussion of Emma Dickerson and Her Puzzles